Climate Governance and sustainable development: Rethinking policy responses for a resilient future
Keywords:
Climate Governance, Institutional Resilience, Policy Effectiveness, Sustainable Development, Sustainability, TransparencyAbstract
This research focused on the studies regarding the role of climate governance, policy effectiveness, and institutional resilience in sustainable development. A quantitative research technique was chosen, which involved a structured questionnaire administered to 350 respondents from different institutions (NGOs, private sector, academic institutions, and government institutions) active in the climate and sustainability sectors, drawn using simple random sampling. The data were analyzed descriptively, with reliability, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression in SPSS Version 27. The reliability test showed good internal consistency in this study, ranging from 0.876 to 0.918 Cronbach's α. The descriptive statistics showed positive perceptions of all the variables studied, ranging from 4.09 to 4.26. The research found that all factors of climate governance, policy effectiveness, institutional resilience, as well sustainable development, showed positive correlations with each other (ranging from 0.653 to 0.781; p < 0.01), as obtained through correlation analysis. Multiple regression analysis revealed that climate governance (β = 0.352, p < 0.001), policy effectiveness (β = 0.291, p < 0.001), and institutional resilience (β = 0.334, p < 0.001) are significant determinants of sustainable development. The regression model explained 74.3% of the variance in sustainable development (R² = 0.743; F = 334.58; p < 0.001). The study attributes high governance quality and good governance performance, through policy enforcement and institutional strengthening, to high sustainable development outcomes. It concludes that these three play significant roles in supporting sustainable development. The results are relevant to policymakers who are interested in strengthening Climate Governance mechanisms for a sustainable future.
Downloads
References
Bäckstrand, K., Zelli, F., & Schleifer, P. (2022). Legitimacy and accountability in polycentric climate governance. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3(6), 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00291-6
Biermann, F., Abbott, K., Andresen, S., Bäckstrand, K., Bernstein, S., Betsill, M. M., Bulkeley, H., Cashore, B., Clapp, J., Folke, C., Gupta, A., Gupta, J., Haas, P. M., Jordan, A., Kanie, N., Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., Meadowcroft, J., & Zondervan, R. (2012). Transforming governance and institutions for global sustainability: Key insights from the Earth System Governance Project. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.014
Biermann, F., Hickmann, T., Sénit, C. A., Beisheim, M., Bernstein, S., Chasek, P., Grob, L., Kim, R. E., Kotzé, L. J., Nilsson, M., Ordóñez Llanos, A., Okereke, C., Pradhan, P., Raven, R., Sun, Y., & Vijge, M. J. (2022). Scientific evidence on the political impact of the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 5(9), 795–800. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00909-5
Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. E. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: The novel approach of the Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010
Bowen, K. J., Cradock-Henry, N. A., Koch, F., Patterson, J., Häyhä, T., Vogt, J., & Barbi, F. (2017). Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals: Towards addressing three key governance challenges—Collective action, trade-offs, and accountability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.05.002
Bulkeley, H., & Mol, A. P. J. (2003). Participation and environmental governance: Consensus, ambivalence and debate. Environmental Values, 12(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327103129341261
Folke, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J., Galaz, V., Westley, F., Lamont, M., Scheffer, M., Österblom, H., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Seto, K. C., & Walker, B. (2021). Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere. Ambio, 50(4), 834–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01544-8
Gupta, J. (2016). Climate change governance: History, future, and triple-loop learning? WIREs Climate Change, 7(2), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.388
Gupta, J., & Sanchez, N. (2012). Global green governance: Embedding the green economy in a global green and equitable rule of law polity. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 21(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2012.00739.x
Gupta, J., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Zondervan, R. (2023). Strengthening institutional resilience for climate adaptation and sustainable development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101281
Hickmann, T., Biermann, F., Sénit, C. A., Beisheim, M., Bernstein, S., Chasek, P., Grob, L., Kim, R. E., Kotzé, L. J., Nilsson, M., Ordóñez Llanos, A., Okereke, C., Pradhan, P., Raven, R., Sun, Y., & Vijge, M. J. (2024). Global governance and the Sustainable Development Goals: Progress and future directions. Nature Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01329-5
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/
International Energy Agency. (2023). World Energy Outlook 2023. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023
Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., & Berkhout, F. (2023). Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 48, 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112321-095825
Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., & Berkhout, F. (2018). Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108284646
Newig, J., & Fritsch, O. (2023). Environmental governance and policy implementation: Recent advances and future directions. Environmental Policy and Governance, 33(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2019
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Climate action monitor 2023. https://www.oecd.org/climate-change/
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
Sachs, J. D., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Drumm, E. (2024). Sustainable Development Report 2024. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. https://doi.org/10.25546/108572
Stevenson, H., & Dryzek, J. S. (2014). Democratizing global climate governance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139208628
United Nations Development Programme. (2024). Human Development Report 2023/2024: Breaking the gridlock—Reimagining cooperation in a polarized world. https://hdr.undp.org/
United Nations Environment Programme. (2024). Emissions Gap Report 2024. https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report
United Nations. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special edition. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/
Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Felländer, A., Langhans, S. D., Tegmark, M., & Nerini, F. F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications, 11, Article 233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y
World Bank. (2024). State and trends of carbon pricing 2024. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/
Young, O. R. (2017). Governing complex systems: Social capital for the Anthropocene. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262036047.001.0001.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sultan Mahmood, Wajahat Hussain, Zainab Ranjha (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
