The Supreme Court of Pakistan as a federal court an analysis
Keywords:
Supreme Court, Federalism, Intergovernmental Relations, Judiciary, PakistanAbstract
An independent judiciary is an integral part of modern federations as it plays an important role in strengthening federal values. It protects minority rights; safeguards separation of powers within the federal structure and resolve disagreements between federation and the provinces, and between the provinces. Therefore, in most cases, contemporary federal constitutions assign these roles to superior courts. In this context, this study examines the role of the Supreme Court (SC) of Pakistan as a federal court, acting as a referee in disputes between the federation and the provinces, or among the provinces. This study presents an in-depth analysis of certain selected cases decided by the SC of Pakistan, aimed at safeguarding the federal character of the state. The findings offer a modest contribution to the field and serve as a valuable source for policymakers and legal scholars to grasp the federal role of the SC of Pakistan
Downloads
References
Aroney, N., & Kincaid, J. (2017). Courts in federal countries: Federalists or unitarists. University of Toronto Press.
Chaudhry, U. A. (2011). Jurisprudence of a Fledgling Federation: A Critical Analysis of Pakistan's Judicial View on Federalism. Cornell Law School, 4(50), 1-19.
Cheema, M. H. (2018). Two steps forward one step back: The non-linear expansion of judicial power in Pakistan. International journal of constitutional law, 16(2), 503-526.
Court, S. (2024, 07 31). Supreme Court of pakistan. Retrieved from https://www.supremecourt.gov.pk.
Davis, R., & Burnham, J. (1989). The Role of the Federal Judiciary in the Development of Federalism in West Germany and the United States. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 12(1), 63–112.
Dichio, M. A. (2018). The US Supreme Court and the centralization of federal authority. Suny Press.
Dichio, M. A., & Somin, I. (2023). Rethinking the Supreme Court’s Impact on American Federalism and Centralization. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 53(2), 153-173.
Do, M., & Schertzer, R. (2024). How Should Courts Respond to Political Questions? Exploring the Dialogical Turn in the Supreme Court of Canada’s Federalism and Indigenous Case Law. Law & Social Inquiry, 49(1), 478-508.
Fessha, Y. T., Kössler, K., & Palermo, F. (Eds.). (2022). Intergovernmental relations in divided societies. Springer Nature.
Government of Sindh through Secretary Health Department and others v. Nadeem Rizvi and Others, (2020) S.C.M.R. 1.
Harding, M. S., & Snow, D. (2023). From the ivory tower to the courtroom: Cooperative federalism in the Supreme Court of Canada. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 53(1), 106-132.
Kössler, K., & Fessha, Y. T. (2022). Federalism and the Courts. In Encyclopedia of Contemporary Constitutionalism (pp. 1-16). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Kundi, M. A. (2002). Federalism in Pakistan: Issues and Prospects. Asian and African Studies, 11(1), 37-48. https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/052012444_Kundi.pdf.
Kureshi, Y. (2022). Seeking supremacy: The pursuit of judicial power in Pakistan. Cambridge University Press.
Lahore Development Authority vs. Imrana Tiwana, (2015) S.C.M.R 1739.
Malik, A. A. (2023). Judicial Review and the Rule of Law in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 18(3), 291-302.
Munir, K., & Khalid, I. (2020). Judicial activism in Pakistan: A case study of Supreme Court Judgments 2008-13. South Asian Studies, 33(2), 321-334.
Pakistan, S. C. (2015-16). Annual Report of Supreme Court of Pakistan. Islamabad: Supreme Court of Pakistan.https://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/downloads_judgements/all_downloads/annual_reports/SCP_Annual_Report_2015_2016_.pdf.
Pakistan, S. C. (2018). Annual reports of Supreme Court of Pakistan. Islamadbad: Supreme Court of Pakistan.https://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/downloads_judgements/all_downloads/annual_reports/SCP_Annual_Report_2017_2018_.pdf.
Pakistan, S. C. (2018-19). Annual Reports of Supreme Court of Pakistan. Islamabad: Supreme court of Pakistan.https://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/downloads_judgements/all_downloads/annual_reports/SCP_Annual_Report_2018_2019.pdf.
Pakistan, S. C. (2020-2022). Annual Report of Supreme Court of Pakistan. Islamabad: Supreme Court of Pakistan.https://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/downloads_judgements/all_downloads/annual_reports/SCP_Annual_Report_2020_2022.pdf.
Pakistan, S. C. (2022). Annual Report of Pakistan. Islamabad: Supreme Court of Pakistan. https://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/downloads_judgements/all_downloads/annual_reports/SCP_Annual_Report_2020_2022.pdf.
Popelier, P., & Bielen, S. (2019). How courts decide federalism disputes: Legal merit, attitudinal effects, and strategic considerations in the jurisprudence of the Belgian Constitutional Court. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 49(4), 587-616.
Shakoor Chandio, A., Tunio, F. H., & Korai, A. G. (2024). Federalism in South Asia: a constitutional analysis of India and Pakistan. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 1-12. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23311983.2023.2299536.
Sindh Revenue Board through Chairman Government of Sindh and another Vs. The Civil Aviation Authority of Pakistan through Airport Manager. (2017 SCMR 1344).
Somin, I. (2024). How Federalism Promotes Unity Through Diversity. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 47, 65-74.
Soofi, B. B. (2023). The Eighteenth Amendment at trial in Pakistan’s Supreme Court. Indian Law Review, 7(3), 387-402.
Sui Southern Gas Ltd and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others, (2018) S.C.M.R. 802.
Swenden, W., & Saxena, R. (2022). Policing the federation: The Supreme Court and judicial federalism in India. Territory, Politics, Governance, 10(1), 12-31.
The Constitution of Pakistan, 1973. https://na.gov.pk/uploads/documents/1333523681_951.pdf.
Thorlakson, L. (2003). Comparing federal institutions: Power and representation in six federations. West European Politics, 26(2), 1-22.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Malik Husnain Awan, Dr. Muhammad Mushtaq (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



